Many
a times tourist to Kochi would get confusing answers if one asks about
Tripunitara Palace. The best way to get around is to enquire about
Tripunitara Museum which is away from the township of Tripunitara. This
place is situated enroute to the famous temple of Chottinakara ( 6 km
before the temple )
This
palace is purported to be built on the hillock which is not very
prominent in 1865 by the Kochi King Rama Varma ( 1864 – 1888 ) who
completed the work begun by uncle Ravi Varma ( 1853 – 1864 ). A brief
history of the Kochi kingdom would not be out of place to understand the
lineage of the Kochi Kings.
According
to keralamahatmyam ( 44th chapter ) King Vishravanas daughter Bala
prayed to Parusurama and wished that a land should be created in her
name. In keeping with her wish Lord Parusurama created a land out of
the sea bed and called it Kochi. ( which later became Cochin ) There
is another well known story that the last Perumal who reigned Kerala
divided his kingdom among his nephews and sons and got himself converted
to Islam and went to Mecca on a piligrimage. Keralopathi states “ The
last famous Perumal King Cheraman Perumal ruled kerala for 36 years.
He left for Mecca by ship with some muslims who arrived at Cragannore
port and converted into Islam. Before leaving for Mecca he divided his
kingdom among his nephews and sons “. The lineage of the Kochi kings is
traced to Surya-chandra vamsha as per puranas.
During
the 12th century Vanneri was the capital of the kings. Than the focus
shifted to Crangnnore, present day Kodganallur since the maritime trade
with the Arab world flourished. The Zamorins attacked this place and
took possession forcing the kings to move towards Kochi and
Tripunithara. In 1341 AD a massive flood wiped out Crangannore and the
port was relocated in Kochi. It also created an isle of Vypin.
In
1555 the dutch palace at Mattancheri was built by the Portuguese and
presented to the King Veera Kerala Varma ( 1537 – 1565 ) and later some
extension and renovations were carried out by the Dutch in 1663 AD.
The capital was shifted to Trichur for a long time. In the beginning of
the 18th century Tripunithara started gaining prominence due to the
constant fighting between the Zamorin, British and Portuguese. Around
1755 Thampuram family left Vellarapalli and settled in tripunithara.
Thus it became the capital of the Kochi Kings and the palace was built
in 1865.
The palace is housed in a terrain of 54 acres
presently but in the past it must have encompassed a much larger area.
The palace was taken over the by Kerala govt after independence and
handed over to ASI in 1980 AD. It was converted into a museum in 1986
AD and thrown open to public. A famous Malayalam movie Manichitrathazhu
was shot in this premise.
Currently
the palace is under renovation ( 22/10/09 ) when we visited we found
that the visit to the museum is banned due to renovation efforts. It is
surprising the entire premises consisting of 3 enclosures is closed,
which seems to be wrong planning. They could have closed one and left
open the other two for public viewing. Further even after plenty of
rainfall the landscaping was not undertaken, many of the plants looked
dried up, which obviously points to the fact that proper manure or
fertilizers are not being used to upkeep the gardens.
The
heritage look of the palace is not present and a dull ghostly look is
prevalent. There is a graveyard of Pareekshit Thamuran ( 1876- 1964 AD
) housed within the premises. Many of the buildings have not been
occupied and it is strange that upkeep too has not taken place despite
being under ASI for nearly 30 years. There is a heritage centre wherein
the ASI office is located and a mural restoration school and
conservation centre is housed in another enclosure. These areas are
restricted to the public.
The palace is constructed
with Mangalore tiled roof to prevent the effects of heavy rainfall. The
central citadel consists of first floor with a beautifully carved
wooden staircase leading to upstairs. The palace must be filled with
antiques which we could not see, there was one elephant statue in wooden
which was covered with plastic sheets and a wooden cot in one of the
rooms.
The
palace landscaping is built on three stepped enclosures with a road
leading upto the palace, which seems to have been modified according to
the British style. The steps leading from the enterance upto the palace
is quite unique. There is a deer park behind the palace. A beautiful
dinosaurs is carved in wood and installed to the left of the palace.
Enclosure
near the dear park looks to be horse stable where the horses may have
been housed along with a small pond located adjescent to this place.
There are other places which are restricted and kept under lock and key.
They may be definitely housing the antiques in view of the renovation
work.
At the enterance there is another huge pond
which may be harvesting the rain water for usage of common public and
the staff of the palace. There are number of shade providing trees and a
few flowering plants in the premises. Two water fountains in a ruinous
state is found. For some time the british seems to have occupied this
palace, because the fountain concept is purely a british legacy. The
statue adorning the fountain seems to be some English character. There
is grave yard of one of the kings within the premises.
Entrance
ticket of Rs 10 per head is charged along with Rs 25 for still camera,
which seems strange even when the palace museum is closed. The worst
part is that a premium is charged on the books sold by the Dept of
Archaeology. Normally such books should not cost beyond Rs 100 to Rs
150, considering that gods own country is expensive, it is priced at Rs
300/- and the staff add their own commission by charging Rs 50 above the
MRP. It is better they streamline their act and instruct the staff not
to blackmarket the books of heritage to the tourist.
Overall
a visit to Tripunithara palace reveal the recent heritage almost just
covering 150 years. Once the renovation is complete we might get to see
its glory. Obviously photography is not allowed inside the museum. We
hope to have a glimpse of the same through their books in the coming
years. It gives me an impression that the royalty were a puppet king
mostly under sovereignty of the Dutch, Zamorins and the British.